Legal Opinion
In re the Arbitration Between Travelers Indemnity Co. & Sherwood
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 10, 1960PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGeorge M. Fanelli, J.
Petitioner’s application to stay arbitration is denied (see Matter of Royal Ind. Co. v. McMahon, 10 A D 2d 926; Matter of Bankers & Shippers Ins. Co. [Schaefer], 10 A D 2d 573, motions for leave to appeal denied 10 A D 2d *514625, 7 N Y 2d 711). The record on appeal in the Bankers & Shippers case (supra) indicates that Mr. Justice Conloh in ■ denying the insurance company’s application to stay arbitration held that the arbitration clause (substantially similar to the one at bar) which covers a dispute as to whether the claimant under the policy is legally entitled to recover damages from the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gerka v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Taylor v. United States Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Marcus v. United States Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- In re the Arbitration between American National Fire Insurance & McCormackNew York Supreme Court · 1958
- In re the Arbitration between Lowe & Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1959
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re the Arbitration between Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp. & ScottNew York Supreme Court · 1961
- In re the Arbitration between Travelers Indemnity Co. & SherwoodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961