Legal Opinion

In re the Arbitration between Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp. & Scott

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 14, 1961PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFrank A. Gtjlotta, J.

Each of these four motions by Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation, also known by the short title MVAIC, seeks a stay of an arbitration proceeding *493which has been initiated in each case by a claimant-respondent who for one reason or another finds that he has a claim against a motorist who is without liability insurance coverage.

The Scott case involves an uninsured auto; the Di Ceglio case, a hit and run auto; the Caruso case, a disclaimer by the prospective defendant’s insurance company because of late notice; and the Morrison case, a similar disclaimer for the same reason.

These…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re the Arbitration Between Travelers Indemnity Co. & SherwoodNew York Supreme Court · 1960

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brewer v. Allstate Insurance CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  2. In re the Arbitration between Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp. & HolleyNew York Supreme Court · 1962
  3. In re the Arbitration between Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp. & GoldmanNew York Supreme Court · 1961
  4. In re the Arbitration between Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp. & MossmanNew York Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API