Legal Opinion

(PS) Zito Family Trust v. John Hancock Financial Services, Inc.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided August 2, 2022No. 2:21-cv-02098Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ZITO FAMILY TRUST; THOMAS J. No. 2:21-cv-2098 JAM DB PS ZITO, SOLE TRUSTEE, 12 Plaintiffs, 13 ORDER v. 14 JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL 15 SERVICES, INC., et al., 16 Defendants, 17 18 Plaintiff Thomas Zito is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the 19 undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Pending 20 before the undersigned are defendants’ motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal 21 Rules of Civil Procedure and motions to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API