Legal Opinion

Frace v. City of Tacoma

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1896No. 2340PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Pierce County:—Hon. John C. Stallcup, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Gordon, J.

Plaintiff in this action is the owner, and in possession of, 160 acres of land lying within the corporate limits of the city of Tacoma. He brought this action to restrain the collection and enforcement of taxes levied and assessed against the land by the city for the years 1893 and 1894. The grounds relied upon for relief are that the corporate limits of the city as originally incorporated did not include his land; that, in attempting to extend its limits, the city wholly failed to comply with the provisions of the act of March, 1890 (Gen.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Morford v. UngerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1859
  2. Kuhn v. City of Port TownsendWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Ferguson v. City of SnohomishWashington Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. City of Topeka v. DwyerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  2. Port of Tacoma v. ParosaWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Hatch v. Consumers Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Dixon v. City of BremertonWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Moore v. Town of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API