Sanchez v. Derby

r,iPEÍrC-dRIAM':-’

^■íWpbírfdhéariñgahdreargumehtVwé'fihd'thatdhe triál- court® abüsbd-its''■ discretion® When-it limited -t;he'd'e¿firñbhy;of -á: board-certified neürópsyChblogist ré|&díñg-hráih-'daiiiágé; allegedly SUffferedfby the iplainti-ffy Máry'KtPSárióh'e'z/itó’ian automobile■aécid’eñt.'•*■' r ■> !•;■■•■ vg-a-í! :c rein nljv>í<í:.'íí-)mSk

This-court, sitting in division, originally held in a majority opinion that the trial court had not abused its discretion when it limited the neuropsychologist’s testimony regarding plaintiff’s alleged brain damage. Sanchez v. Derby, 228 Neb. 497, 423…