Wright v. Sport Supply Group, Inc.
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DON BURGESS, Justice.
Appellants, Dan Wright and Riddell, Inc., ask this court to dissolve a temporary injunction entered against them at the request of Sport Supply Group, Inc. (“SSG”). Wright, a former SSG sports equipment salesman, now sells sports equipment for Riddell. The trial court found Wright’s employment with Riddell violates a confidentiality and noncompetition agreement between Wright and SSG. The trial court’s order restrains Wright and Riddell, in conjunction with Wright, from performing “sales related services or activities” for business in competition with SSG for…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Butnaru v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
- Davis v. HueyTexas Supreme Court · 1978
- Light v. Centel Cellular Co. of TexasTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- Universal Health Services, Inc. v. Thompson, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2000
- Lawrence v. CDB Services, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- Karen D'Onofrio v. Vacation Publications, ICourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
- TMC Worldwide, L.P. v. Gray, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2005
- EMSL Analytical, Inc. v. Younker, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2004
- TransPerfect Translations, Inc. v. LeslieDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2009
- Interstate 35/Chisam Road, L.P. v. MoayediCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2012
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.