Murphy Truck Lines v. Brown
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. C~fttee Justice Neil
delivered the opinion of the Court.
This appeal presents the following question for decision: where the trial judge has approved the verdict of the jury for and on behalf of the plaintiffs, but suggests *416a remittitur of 50 per oent of the verdict which is accepted under protest, what supervisory authority does the Court of Appeals have with respect to a restoration of the original verdict, or a part of the remittitur suggested by the trial court?
We granted certiorari and filed with the record the following Per Curiam Opinion:
‘ ‘ This case originated in the Circuit Court…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Grant v. Louisville & Nashville Railway Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1913
- Waller v. SkeltonTennessee Supreme Court · 1948
- Lambert Bros. v. LarkinsTennessee Supreme Court · 1956
3Cited by18 opinions
- Aundrey MEALS Ex Rel. William MEALS v. FORD MOTOR COMPANYTennessee Supreme Court · 2013
- Long v. MattinglyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1990
- Ellis v. White Freightliner Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1980
- Smith v. SheltonTennessee Supreme Court · 1978
- Odom v. GrayTennessee Supreme Court · 1974
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.