Legal Opinion

Odom v. Gray

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1974PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Certiorari was granted in this case on one point only, to wit: Can punitive damages or “smart” money be awarded against joint or multiple defendants when the financial worth of only one defendant is introduced into the evidence ?

The factual allegations in the complaint were found in favor of the plaintiff by the jury, approved by the trial judge, and concurred in by the Court of Appeals, and from a review of the voluminous record, we agree that the record supports that finding of facts.

There are two lines of authority on this question, generally referred to as the majority rule and…

3Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Washington Gas Light Co. v. LansdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. StevensonTennessee Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Booth v. KirkCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1963
  4. Kauffman v. AH Robins CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Loftis v. FinchCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1972

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by31 opinions

  1. Lunsford v. MorrisTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Embrey v. HollyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
  3. Briner v. HyslopSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983
  4. In Re ESTATE OF Raymond L. SMALLMANTennessee Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Huckeby v. SpanglerTennessee Supreme Court · 1978

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API