Alabama Power Company v. Cleckler
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
MADDOX, Justice.
The only issue presented on this appeal involves the irregularity of a jury verdict.
When the jury foreman announced the verdict to the court, in this negligence action, he stated it as “$45,000.” On the verdict form, however, the amount was shown as “$4,500.”
The jury concluded its deliberations at 9:50 a. m., when the foreman read the verdict as $45,000. The jury was .requested to remain in the courtroom so they could be qualified in another case. One member was excused for the remainder of the day. The trial judge discovered, within twenty minutes, the inconsistency between…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- St. Clair v. Caldwell & RiddleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
- Alexiou v. ChristuSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
3Cited by4 opinions
- Mickle v. MickleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
- Preferred Risk Mutual Insurance Co. v. StuartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
- Hood v. HamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
- Preferred Risk Mutual Insurance Co. v. StuartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981