Legal Opinion

St. Clair v. Caldwell & Riddle

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 15, 1882PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Jackson. Tried before the Hon. H. C. Speaice.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

Caldwell and Riddle jointly brought an action for a mule, against Fennell. The suit was under the statute which provides for the recovery of chattels in specie; and the plaintiffs having complied with the statute, by making oath that the property belonged to them, and by giving bond, obtained an order for the seizure of the property, and it was seized. Thereupon, St. Clair made claim to the property, under the statute, and a trial of the right to the property was then had between Caldwell and Riddle as plaintiffs, and St. Clair as claimant. The hour of adjournment having arrived, while the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brister v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1855
  2. Waller v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1867
  3. Sewall v. GliddenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1840
  4. Clay v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1869
  5. Ewing v. SanfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1852

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. City of Birmingham v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  2. W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. HannonAlabama Court of Appeals · 1945
  3. Dover v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  4. Hayes v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1968
  5. Scott v. ParkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API