Legal Opinion

Ringo v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 15, 1887PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from, Scott Circuit Court. — Hon. J. D. Foster, Judge. (1) The statement fails to allege facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. Rowland v. Railroad,, 73 Mo. 619 ; Bates v. Railroad, 74 Mo. 60; Schultz v. Railroad, 76 Mo. 324; Manz v. Railroad, 87 Mo. 278. (2) The evidence fails to show that plaintiff ’ s animal got on the defendant’s track at a point where it was bound, Ay law, and had failed, to maintain a lawful fence.

Read the full summary

Appeal from, Scott Circuit Court. — Hon. J. D. Foster, Judge. (1) The statement fails to allege facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. Rowland v. Railroad,, 73 Mo. 619 ; Bates v. Railroad, 74 Mo. 60; Schultz v. Railroad, 76 Mo. 324; Manz v. Railroad, 87 Mo. 278. (2) The evidence fails to show that plaintiff ’ s animal got on the defendant’s track at a point where it was bound, Ay law, and had failed, to maintain a lawful fence. Hendrick v. Railroad, 81 Mo. 521; Cecil v. Railroad, 47 Mo. 246 ; Nance ». Railroad, 79 Mó. 196 ; Manz v. Railroad, 87 Mo. 278; Morrow v. Railroad, 82 Mo.…

1Opinion of the CourtBrace, J.

This is a suit commenced in a justice’s court to recover double damages, under section 809, Revised Statutes, 1879, for a mare killed on defendant’s road by a train of cars. The plaintiff had judgment before the justice, and in the circuit court, and the defendant appeals to this court.

The case was tried before the court, without a jury. On the trial, the defendant objected to the introduction of any evidence, for the reason that no cause of action *670was stated. The only ground upon which it is here urged that the statement upon which the case was tried is insufficient, is that it is not…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Manz v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1885
  2. McCoy v. FarmerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1877
  3. Jantzen v. Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1884
  4. Blakely v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  5. Perriquez v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1883

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Summers v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1888
  2. Creason v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1910
  3. Shotwell v. St. Joseph & St. Louis Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1889
  4. Lindsay v. Kansas City, Fort Scott & Memphis RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API