Legal Opinion
Perriquez v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Missouri
Decided April 15, 1883PublishedCited by 8 opinions
Appeal from Osage Circuit, Court. — Hon. A. J. Seay, Judge.
1Opinion of the Court
Philips, C.
Action for double damages for killing cow named “ Hoodie,” instituted before a justice of the peace in Osage county, upon the following statement:
“ Plaintiff for his cause of action against the defendant, alleges that the defendant is and was at the time hereinafter referred to, a corporation duly organized under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Missouri under the corporate name of the-Missouri Pacific Railway Company. Plaintiff" further states that said defendant, by its agents, officers and servants, in conducting, managing and running a locomotive engine and train of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kronski v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1883
- Edwards v. Kansas City, St. Joseph & Council Bluffs RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1881
- Farrell v. Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1883
- Rowland v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1881
- Bates v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1881
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Stanley v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1884
- Darnell v. LaffertyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1905
- Dorman v. Missouri Pacific Ry. Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1885
- Ringo v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1887
- Rowen v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1899
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.