Legal Opinion

Perriquez v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 15, 1883PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Osage Circuit, Court. — Hon. A. J. Seay, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Philips, C.

Action for double damages for killing cow named “ Hoodie,” instituted before a justice of the peace in Osage county, upon the following statement:

“ Plaintiff for his cause of action against the defendant, alleges that the defendant is and was at the time hereinafter referred to, a corporation duly organized under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Missouri under the corporate name of the-Missouri Pacific Railway Company. Plaintiff" further states that said defendant, by its agents, officers and servants, in conducting, managing and running a locomotive engine and train of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kronski v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  2. Edwards v. Kansas City, St. Joseph & Council Bluffs RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1881
  3. Farrell v. Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  4. Rowland v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1881
  5. Bates v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1881

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Stanley v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1884
  2. Darnell v. LaffertyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1905
  3. Dorman v. Missouri Pacific Ry. Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1885
  4. Ringo v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1887
  5. Rowen v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1899

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API