Legal Opinion

Lindsay v. Kansas City, Fort Scott & Memphis Railroad

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 31, 1893Published

Appeal from the Oregon Circuit Coivrt. — Hon. W. N. Evans, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtBond, J.

— This action was brought under section 809 of the Revised Statutes, 1879, section 2611 of the Revised Statutes, 1889, for double damages for the killing of a sow by defendant. The allegations of the amended statement filed in the circuit court are clearly sufficient under -the case of Ringo v. Railroad, 91 Mo. 667, 670, and the proof adduced by plaintiff amply sustained the verdict in his favor. Goodwin v. Railroad, ante, p. 9.

The court gave the following instruction: “You are instructed that, if you believe from the evidence that the defendant, on the twenty-seventh day of June, 1889, owned…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ringo v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1887

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API