Gold v. Arizona Realty & Mortgage Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtWood, J.
Plaintiff sued to recover damages suffered when she slipped in walking down a stairway of defendant’s apartment house. The case was tried before the court with-' out a jury and judgment rendered for defendant. A motion for a new trial was granted and defendant appeals from the order granting the new trial.
Defendant contends that the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to plaintiff, is insufficient to justify a judgment in plaintiff’s favor and for that reason the order should be reversed. The evidence upon which plaintiff must rely to support a judgment in her favor comes from her…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Estate of SextonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Moss v. StubbsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Empire Investment Co. v. MortCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Seth v. Lew HingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Finch v. WillmottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Brown v. Poway Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Wills v. JJ Newberry Co.California Court of Appeal · 1941
- McKellar v. PendergastCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- King v. Union Pac. R. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1949
- Goldsmith v. CodyMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.