Tucker v. Reading Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Per curiam
An affirmance of the decree in this case need depend only upon a single question of fact; i. e., whether Centano, the bargee of the Elmer, brought her alongside the Nash before the tug, Bern, returned. If he did, nothing remains of the argument that unaided he could not relieve the Elmer after she was caught upon the port stern corner of the Nash where she was injured; for he simply failed to act in season. The judge did not, it is true, make a finding specifically upon the question; but the evidence does not leave any doubt. The bargee’s testimony was itself confused and conflicting…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dailey v. CarrollCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
- The JuniorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
- Fulton Lighterage Co. v. Erie R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
- United States Gypsum Co. v. McWilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
- Clyde Lighterage Co. v. Pennsylvania R.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1919
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- John I. Hay Co. v. the Allen B. WoodDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1954
- Lynch v. Agwilines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
- Red Star Towing & Transp. Co. v. Pennsylvania R.District Court, S.D. New York · 1950
- Allied Chemical & Dye Corp. v. Tug Christine MoranCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- Allied Chemical & Dye Corp. v. the Tug Christine MoranDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.