Legal Opinion
Red Star Towing & Transp. Co. v. Pennsylvania R.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 17, 1950PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEIBELL, District Judge.
The limitation and exoneration proceeding (A 144-151) was instituted in this Southern District by the owners and charterers of the tug Mary T. Tracy. Two actions were brought by damage claimants : one in this Southern District (A142-72) by the Long Island Lighting Company, as owner of the cargo of coal aboard the coal barge Red Star No. 50, against the Tracy Towing Line, Inc., the Pennsylvania Railroad Company and the tugs Mary T. Tracy and the Baltimore; and the other in the Eastern District (later removed to this Southern District) (A 163-155) by the Red Star Towing…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Just v. ChambersSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Coryell v. PhippsSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Stevens v. the White CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- La BourgogneSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Providence & New York Steamship Co. v. Hill Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1883
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Paducah Towing Company, Inc. v. Paducah Towing Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Paducah Towing Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
- In Re the Complaint of SheenDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1989
- Allied Chemical & Dye Corp. v. the Tug Christine MoranDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961
- Federal Barge Lines, Inc. v. Star Towing Co.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.