Legal Opinion

Puleo v. Chase Bank USA, N.A.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided May 10, 2010No. 08-3837PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

FUENTES, Circuit Judge,

with whom McKEE, Chief Judge, and SLOVITER, SCIRICA, SMITH, and JORDAN, Circuit Judges, join.

This case focuses on the proper boundaries between the decision-making responsibilities of courts and arbitrators. Appellants Francis and Trish Puleo (“the Púleos”) brought suit challenging retroactive interest-rate increases on the account balances of their Chase Bank credit cards. Although the Chase Bank Card-member Agreement governing their credit cards contains an Arbitration Agreement expressly barring class actions, the Púleos brought their suit in a…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. Guidotti v. Legal Helpers Debt Resolution, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
  2. Quilloin v. Tenet HealthSystem Philadelphia, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
  3. Chesapeake Appalachia, LLC v. Scout Petroleum, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
  4. John MacDonald v. Cashcall IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
  5. Bobbie James v. Global TelLink CorpCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API