Estate of Horkan v. Croal
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtEschweiler, J.
The executors, appellants here, contend that the claim of Mrs. Croal, respondent, -ought not to be entertained at all because not presented or filed within the time limited by statute and by the original order of the court for the filing and hearing of claims.
Having reached the conclusion, as hereinafter stated, that Mrs. Croal is entitled to have declared certain property coming into the hands of the executors impressed with a trust in her favor, we are of the opinion that such a right is not a claim against the estate proper as in the case of ordinary debts or demands covered by sec.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Young v. . YoungNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- First Nat. Bank v. HummelSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
- Govin v. . De MirandaNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Brown v. Town of SebastopolCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Lannon v. HackettWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Christensen v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1963
- Estate of NolsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
- In Re Estate of TaylorWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- Bingen v. First Trust Co. of St. PaulCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
- Joerres v. KoscielniakWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.