Legal Opinion

John Gil Construction, Inc. v. Riverso

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 6, 2000No. 99 Civ. 6112(SAS)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.

Plaintiff John Gil Construction, Inc. (“JGC”) brings this action, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, against defendants Milo Riverso, The New York City School Construction Authority (the “SCA”), New York City Off-Track Betting Corporation (“OTB”) and The Department of Investigation for the City of New York (“DOI”). 1 Plaintiff alleges that defendants violated its constitutional rights to due process and equal protection of the laws in connection with (i) a criminal investigation of plaintiff by OTB and DOI; and (ii) the SCA’s suspension of plaintiffs…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Kailash C. Pani, M.D., and Kailash C. Pani, M.D., P.C. v. Empire Blue Cross Blue ShieldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  3. Cooper v. ParskyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  4. Kaluczky v. City of White PlainsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  5. Martinez v. SimonettiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States Fire Insurance v. United Limousine Service, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2004
  2. Munno v. Town of OrangetownDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
  3. Nasso v. SeagalDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2003
  4. Action Electrical Contracting Co. v. RiversoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API