Legal Opinion
Nasso v. Seagal
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided April 11, 2003No. CV-03-0443(CPS)PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SIFTON, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiff Julius R. Nasso, individually and derivatively as a shareholder of Sea-gal-Nasso Productions, Inc. (“Productions”), brings this action against Steven Seagal and Steamroller Productions, Inc. (“Steamroller”), alleging breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, seizure of corporate opportunities, misrepresentation, conversion, and unjust enrichment. Defendants move to dissolve orders entered by the state court from which this action was removed and to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Rules 12(b)(2) and 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules…
2Cases cited100 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Holmes v. AC & S, INC.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2004
- Firestone v. BerriosDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- Cosy Goose Hellas v. Cosy Goose USA. Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- US Airways, Inc. v. PMA Capital Ins. Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2004
- Laney v. Schneider National Carriers, Inc.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.