Legal Opinion

Crawford v. Janklow

District Court, D. South Dakota

Decided February 18, 1983No. Civ. 82-3078PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

DONALD J. PORTER, District Judge.

Named plaintiffs are residents of the State of South Dakota who receive home energy assistance through their participation in the low income housing program defined in 42 U.S.C. § 1437f, commonly called the Section 8 housing program. They have sued the Governor of South Dakota and the Secretary of the South Dakota Department of Social Services for the categorical exclusion of named plaintiffs and of persons similarly situated from participation in the State’s Low Income Energy Assistance Program (LIEAP), funded and defined by Congress in 42…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. King v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. New York City Transit Authority v. BeazerSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Roaden v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Lau v. NicholsSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Crawford v. JanklowCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
  2. Clifford v. JanklowCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
  3. Boles v. EarlDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1985
  4. Crawford v. JanklowCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
  5. Clifford v. JanklowCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API