Legal Opinion
Bobich v. Stewart
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided December 31, 1992No. S-4517, S-4628PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MOORE, Justice.
This appeal concerns an action by Jimmie Stewart and Sharon Stewart to recover unpaid overtime compensation and damages from their employer, Dimond Mini-Storage. At trial, the jury found that Dimond Mini-Storage was an employer of four or more employees and thus owed the Stewarts overtime pay under the Alaska Wage and Hour Act (hereinafter AWHA), AS 23.10.-050-.150. The jury awarded compensatory and liquidated damages to the Stewarts. In addition, the trial court awarded the Stewarts both prejudgment interest and attorney’s fees. Dimond Mini-Storage appeals, and the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Brooklyn Savings Bank v. O'NeilSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- City of Whittier v. Whittier Fuel & Marine Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1978
- Beck v. State, Department of Transportation & Public FacilitiesAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
- Donovan v. Dialamerica Marketing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Demoski v. NewAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Noffke v. PerezAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
- Cameron v. CHANG-CRAFTAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
- Krone v. State, Department of Health & Social ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
- Bliss v. BobichAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
- Grimes v. Kinney Shoe Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1997
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.