Legal Opinion
Biggans v. Hajoca Corp. Dash v. Hajoca Corp
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided December 18, 1950No. 10163, 10164PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STALEY, Circuit Judge.
Much of the law governing the disposition of the issues here on appeal has been expounded at length in a recent opinion of this Court, 1 and need not be repeated. Even later decisions of Pennsylvania courts 2 demonstrate that the opinions handed down in Simpson v. Montgomery Ward & Co., 1946, 354 Pa. 87, 46 A.2d 674, and Curley v. Automobile Finance Co., 1941, 343 Pa. 280, 23 A.2d 48, which we interpreted in Van Sant v. American Express Co., 3 Cir. 1947, 169 F.2d 355, represent faithfully the law of Pennsylvania. 3 In charging the jury, the district judge noted the skill…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Palmer v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Skidmore v. Baltimore & OR Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
- Hughes v. BabcockSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Simpson v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Griffiths v. Cigna Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Eric McNello v. John B. Kelly, Inc. v. B. J. Lucarelli and Company, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
- Shelton v. EvansSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Thomas v. E. J. Korvette, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1971
- Robert E. Lynn, Alicia J. Lynn v. William F. Smith, John E. Young, Charles Benedict, Henry J. Danielson, J. Regis Thompson, Charles AnthonyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.