Legal Opinion

Czarnikow-Rionda Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided November 2, 1972No. 5471, C.A.D. 1071PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MaRket, OMef Judge.

This is an appeal from the decision and judgment of the United States Customs Court, 66 Cust. Ct. 431, C.D. 4229 (1971), overruling appellant’s protest against the assessment of additional duties under TSUS item 901.00. We affirm.

The merchandise, raw Philippine sugar, was classified without challenge under TSUS item 155.20 as sugars. The controversy arises over the further ’assessment under TSUS item 901.00, fa temporary provision for additional duties found in part 1 of the appendix to< the tariff schedules which reads as follows:

901.00 Sugars, sirups, and molasses…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. The United States (Ralph Valls, Party-In-Interest) v. Hammond Lead Products, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
  2. Czarnikow-Rionda Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. National Corn Growers Ass'n v. BakerUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
  2. Struthers v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1977
  3. United States v. Hugo Stinnes Steel & Metals Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
  4. J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1978
  5. Clarendon Marketing, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API