Millay v. State of Maine Department of
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SELYA, Circuit Judge.
This case presents a question of first impression at the federal appellate level: what limitations period applies to an action for judicial review brought pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 722(c)(5)(J)? The choice is between borrowing state law (in this instance, the law of Maine) or defaulting to the federal catch-all statute of limitations, 28 U.S.C. § 1658(a). The district court chose the latter. After careful consideration, we affirm.
The stage is easily set. In 2010, plaintiff-appellee John M. Millay, blind since childhood, 1 sought transportation subsidies from a Maine state…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Jones v. R. R. Donnelley & Sons Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
- City of Rancho Palos Verdes v. AbramsSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers Union, Local No. 59 v. Superline Transportation Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- North Star Steel Co. v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Doe v. PfrommerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- RFF Family Partnership, LP v. Ross Ex Rel. BD Lending TrustCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
- United States v. GrafCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
- Mercado v. Government of PRCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
- Fletcher v. Louisiana Department of Transportation and DevelopmentDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2019
- Garcia-Castro v. Commonwealth of Puerto RicoDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2024
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.