Legal Opinion

Millay v. State of Maine Department of

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided August 11, 2014No. 14-1134PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SELYA, Circuit Judge.

This case presents a question of first impression at the federal appellate level: what limitations period applies to an action for judicial review brought pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 722(c)(5)(J)? The choice is between borrowing state law (in this instance, the law of Maine) or defaulting to the federal catch-all statute of limitations, 28 U.S.C. § 1658(a). The district court chose the latter. After careful consideration, we affirm.

The stage is easily set. In 2010, plaintiff-appellee John M. Millay, blind since childhood, 1 sought transportation subsidies from a Maine state…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Jones v. R. R. Donnelley & Sons Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. City of Rancho Palos Verdes v. AbramsSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers Union, Local No. 59 v. Superline Transportation Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
  4. North Star Steel Co. v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Doe v. PfrommerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. RFF Family Partnership, LP v. Ross Ex Rel. BD Lending TrustCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
  2. United States v. GrafCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
  3. Mercado v. Government of PRCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
  4. Fletcher v. Louisiana Department of Transportation and DevelopmentDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2019
  5. Garcia-Castro v. Commonwealth of Puerto RicoDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2024

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API