Legal Opinion

Drudge v. Citizens Bank

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 8, 1916No. 9,147PublishedCited by 1 opinion

From Marshall Circuit Court; Harry Bernetha, Judge. Action by Francis M. Drudge against the Citizens Bank of Akron. From a judgment for defendant, the plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtFelt, J.

This is a suit to recover damages for the conversion of the proceeds of five promissory notes. The complaint is in five paragraphs and each is for the re*219covery of the amount of the proceeds of a separate note. The paragraphs are alike except in the description of the notes and the amount demanded. The first paragraph alleges, in substance, that appellee is an incorporated bank under the laws of this State and at the times herein mentioned was engaged in the banking business in the town of Akron, Indiana;'that on July 28, 1910, appellant owned and held a promissory note executed by one Milo…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Peak v. EllicottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
  2. Mutual Accident Ass'n of the Northwest v. JacobsIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. MyersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
  4. Ellicott v. BarnesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
  5. Bixel v. BixelIndiana Supreme Court · 1886

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Drudge v. Citizens Bank of AkronIndiana Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API