Legal Opinion

Walker v. Shrake

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1959No. 4145PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

McNamee, J.:

Complaint was filed by appellants for partition of certain real estate. Thereafter all the parties stipulated that the action would be deemed an action for declaratory relief and amended pleadings were filed to accomplish such purpose.

There is no dispute as to any of the facts; they are admitted as alleged in the amended complaint and the trial court made its findings in accordance therewith.

Respondent Shrake and others, pursuant to written contract, caused application to be made for the acquisition from the federal government of certain lands in which he was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McColgan v. Bank of California Assn.California Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Williams v. Crusader Discount Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Tinsley v. DurfeyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1901
  4. Mayor and Council of Millen v. ClarkSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  5. Pope v. BensterNebraska Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Holland v. Crummer CorporationNevada Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Nevada Bank of Commerce v. Esquire Real Estate, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Mauldin v. MauldinNevada Supreme Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API