Mayor and Council of Millen v. Clark
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Reid, Chief Justice.
We will not alaborate the first two head-notes.
It appears that the city rented a building íor use as a city hall, in which the plaintiff owned an undivided interest, and that during the tenancy the plaintiff became the sole owner. There was evidence sufficient for the jury to have found that the plaintiff directed that the rents accruing on the ^property be applied in payment of taxes and paving assessments against the property in question, and that the city actually drew a voucher for the accumulated rents due to the plaintiff, but, instead of crediting the amount in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Nalley v. McManusSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
- Rish v. IveySupreme Court of Georgia · 1886
- Bell v. ChandlerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1857
- Adams v. KeelerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1860
- New England Mortgage Security Co. v. RobsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
3Cited by4 opinions
- Waldrip v. VoylesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
- Walker v. ShrakeNevada Supreme Court · 1959
- Mauldin v. MauldinNevada Supreme Court · 1972
- Waldrip v. VoylesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991