Legal Opinion

McGrody v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 9, 1963No. Civ. A. No. 33128PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOSEPH S. LORD, III, District Judge,

This is an action under § 1(20) of the-Interstate Commerce Act, 49 U.S.C.A. § 1(20), to enjoin an alleged abandonment by defendant railroad of a river tugboat operation without having first obtained a certificate of public convenience and necessity to abandon, purportedly in violation of § 1(18) of the Act. Individual plaintiff was formerly employed by defendant as captain of its tug. Plaintiff *253union is the collective bargaining representative of the individual plaintiff and executed a collective bargaining agreement with defendant on behalf of its members.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. City of Yonkers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Powell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. Zirn v. Hanover BankCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
  4. Myers v. Arkansas & Ozarks Railway CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1960
  5. Williams v. Atlantic Coast Line R.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth of Pa. v. Penn Central Transp. Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
  2. Brown v. Consolidated Rail Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API