McGrody v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
JOSEPH S. LORD, III, District Judge,
This is an action under § 1(20) of the-Interstate Commerce Act, 49 U.S.C.A. § 1(20), to enjoin an alleged abandonment by defendant railroad of a river tugboat operation without having first obtained a certificate of public convenience and necessity to abandon, purportedly in violation of § 1(18) of the Act. Individual plaintiff was formerly employed by defendant as captain of its tug. Plaintiff *253union is the collective bargaining representative of the individual plaintiff and executed a collective bargaining agreement with defendant on behalf of its members.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- City of Yonkers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Powell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Zirn v. Hanover BankCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
- Myers v. Arkansas & Ozarks Railway CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1960
- Williams v. Atlantic Coast Line R.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Commonwealth of Pa. v. Penn Central Transp. Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
- Brown v. Consolidated Rail Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1976