Legal Opinion
Brown v. Consolidated Rail Corp.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided August 18, 1976No. C76-405PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
LAMBROS, District Judge.
Plaintiffs have brought this action against the Consolidated Rail Corporation (Conrail) seeking declaratory relief, injunctive relief, and damages for Conrail’s alleged improper termination of rail service at the former Erie Lackawanna Ore Dock located on the Cuyahoga River.
By its prior order of May 4, 1976 the Court granted the plaintiffs’ motion for a temporary restraining order enjoining Conrail from discontinuing service at the Erie Dock. However, the Court stayed execution of its order pending a determination by the Special…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
- New Orleans Terminal Company and Southern Pacific Company v. Charles W. SpencerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Baltimore & Annapolis RailroadDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1975
- Interstate Commerce Commission, Appellant-Appellee v. Chicago and North Western Transportation Company and Larry S. Provo, Appellees-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
- City of Alexandria, Louisiana v. Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re Auto-Train Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1981
- Coleman v. Consolidated Rail Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1977