Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Read v. Farmers Irrigation District

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1928No. 26030PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

This is an application by the relator to the district court for Scotts Bluff county for a writ of mandamus to compel the respondent to drain certain lands within its district, pursuant to section 2887, Comp. St. 1922. After issues were duly joined, trial was had, and peremptory writ issued. To reverse this judgment, respondent appeals.

The alternative writ reflects the following alleged facts, in substance: That the respondent is, and has been for more than ten years last past, an irrigation district organized and operated under the laws of the state of Nebraska; that the relator is now, and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Skinner & Eddy Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Board of Directors v. CollinsNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Sheridan County v. HandNebraska Supreme Court · 1926
  4. State ex rel. Cox v. McIlravyNebraska Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Moores v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1904

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. School District v. Board of EqualizationNebraska Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Spurrier v. Mitchell Irrigation DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Halligan v. ElanderNebraska Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Robinson v. ClarkNebraska Supreme Court · 1930
  5. State ex rel. Charvat v. SaglNebraska Supreme Court · 1930

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API