Halligan v. Elander

A former opinion in this case is reported ante p. 156, 22 N. W. 2d 647. Therein we dismissed plaintiff’s petition and supplemental petition, intervener’s petition, and the *711landowner defendants’ cross-petitions, reversing the judgment of the trial court, which found generally for plaintiffs. However, reargument was allowed and upon reconsideration, we conclude that our former opinion should be and hereby is vacated and set aside. In so doing, we arrive at substantially the same result, but base our conclusions upon other grounds, which we believe to be more tenable as well as decisive of all…