Riley Hill General Contractor, Inc. v. Tandy Corp.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtWarden, P. J.
Plaintiff sought compensatory and punitive damages on claims of fraud, breach of implied warranties of merchantability and of fitness for a particular purpose and negligence arising out of plaintiffs purchase of a computer system from defendant. Defendant generally denied the claims and raised several affirmative defenses. The jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff on all counts, awarding $20,000 general and $60,000 punitive damages. Defendant appeals, assigning 14 errors. Because of errors in instructions on fraud and punitive damages, we reverse and remand.
Defendant took exception to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Dizick v. Umpqua Community CollegeOregon Supreme Court · 1979
- Baden v. Sunset Fuel Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1960
- Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance v. McBrideOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- Taylor v. LawrenceOregon Supreme Court · 1961
- Voight v. NybergOregon Supreme Court · 1959
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Riley Hill General Contractor, Inc. v. Tandy Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1987
- Hudson v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988