Legal Opinion

Dizick v. Umpqua Community College

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 11, 1979No. CA 7429, SC 25923PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenecke, C. J.

This is an action for damages for fraudulent representations brought pursuant to the Oregon Tort Claims Act. The principal question is whether the defendant governmental body is immune from liability because the claim is based upon the performance of a "dis cretionary function.”

The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff, however, the trial court granted defendant’s motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict. A Court of Appeals panel of three judges affirmed with one judge specially concurring and one judge dissenting, Dizick v. Umpqua Community College, 33 Or App 559, 577 P2d 534…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Dalehite v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. Conzelmann v. Northwest Poultry & Dairy Products Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Smith v. CooperOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  4. McBride v. MagnusonOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Webb v. ClarkOregon Supreme Court · 1976

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Riley Hill General Contractor, Inc. v. Tandy Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Kilduff v. Adams, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  3. Duyck v. Tualatin Valley Irrigation DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Miller v. Grants Pass Irrigation DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Bradford v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1981

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API