Legal Opinion

Ballantyne v. Anaconda Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1978No. 13768PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Shea

Defendant The Anaconda Company appeals from an order of the District Court, Jefferson County, granting a new trial to plaintiffs George Grant Ballaytyne, George W. Ballantyne, and Evelyn Christensen Peterson, d/b/a Cloverdale Apiaries. For reasons hereinafter set forth we remand this cause to the District Court for further consideration.

Plaintiffs brought this action seeking compensatory and exemplary damages from The Anaconda Company for losses suffered at plaintiffs’ commercial honeybee operation located near Whitehall, Montana. Plaintiffs alleged their bees were poisoned as a result of gas…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Halsey v. UithofMontana Supreme Court · 1975

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Application of BertelsonMontana Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. StumpfMontana Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Giles v. Flint Valley Forest ProductsMontana Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Shannon v. HulettMontana Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Steinmetz v. RobertusMontana Supreme Court · 1981

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API