State v. Stumpf

Defendant William Stumpf appeals from a judgment of the District Court whereby he was sentenced to three years imprisonment for the crime of tampering with witnesses (section 45-7-206, MCA).

Defendant has two basic attacks on the statute itself. He claims that the substantive provisions of the statute are too broad, and fur*226thermore, that the penalty provision does not contain proper guidelines for sentencing. Defendant cites no authority and virtually makes no argument to support his contention that the substantive provision of the statute is too broad, and we are not inclined to do that for…