Legal Opinion

Bentrim v. Bentrim

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided July 6, 1984No. 0216PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Shaw, Judge:

This is an action for child support arrearages and attorney fees. The Family Court Judge awarded no amount for the alleged arrearages and ordered $400 in attorney’s fees to be paid by the respondent-Mr. Bentrim to the appellant-Mrs. Bentrim. We affirm.

After a fourteen year marriage which produced three children [ages fifteen (15), twelve (12), and ten (10) at the time of the trial in August of 1981], the parties separated in June 1979. A Nevada divorce was obtained in January of 1980. Pursuant to the divorce decree, Mrs. Bentrim received custody of the children and child support…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Nienow v. NienowSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
  2. Atkinson v. AtkinsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1983
  3. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
  4. PEOPLES NAT'L BANK OF G'VILLE v. Manos Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1954
  5. Reid v. Hardware Mutual Insurance Insurance Co. of the Carolinas, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Baron Data Systems, Inc. v. LoterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  2. Amick v. HaglerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
  3. Barr v. BarrCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
  4. Wagner v. WagnerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
  5. Barr v. BarrCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API