Legal Opinion

Wagner v. Wagner

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided May 1, 1985No. 0457PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gardner, Judge:

Lana S. Wagner (the mother) and E. Ross Wagner, Jr. (the son) brought this action against Ervin R. Wagner, Sr. (the father) for support and maintenance for college expenses of the son, who was 18 years old at the time and planned to attend Newberry College. The trial court ordered the father, to pay $200 per month as support toward the education of *431the son. We reverse in part and remand.

The father first asserts that the son does not qualify for support beyond the age of 18.

Educational needs have been determined to be exceptional circumstances justifying under certain situations…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Risinger v. RisingerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1979
  2. Millis v. MillisCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  3. Bentrim v. BentrimCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  4. Hughes v. HughesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Voelker v. HillockCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
  2. Wagner v. WagnerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
  3. McDuffie v. McDuffieSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  4. Bull v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  5. Wagner v. WagnerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API