Legal Opinion

Pawling v. Malley

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 21, 1951No. Civ. 4199PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMussell, J.

Defendants appeal from a judgment entered pursuant to a stipulation in an action to fqreclose a mechanic’s lien. The stipulation, which was in writing, dated April 20, 1949, and filed in the action, contained recitals that plaintiff, as contractor, and defendants, as owners, had entered into a contract for the building of certain improvements in the city of Palm Springs; that during the course of construction disputes had arisen between the parties as to changes made in the building, extras furnished, charges made, alleged interference by the owners with the work, and alleged failure of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Newport v. HattonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Franklin v. Nat C. Goldstone AgencyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Dore v. Southern Pac. Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Smith v. HalsteadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rooney v. Vermont Investment Corp.California Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Lawler v. BannermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  3. Stahl v. FahrmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Rooney v. Vermont Investment Corp.California Supreme Court · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API