Legal Opinion

Smith v. Halstead

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 18, 1948No. Civ. 16615PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

Plaintiffs appeal from an order granting a motion for a new trial after judgment had been entered in their favor in an action instituted to recover damages resulting from an automobile accident.

Chronology

1. May 5, 1943, judgment was entered in favor of plaintiff Evelyn Paddock Smith for the sum of $2,500, and in favor of plaintiff Charles B. Paddock for the sum of $3,000 against defendants.

2. December 16, 1946, defendants filed notice of intention to move for a new trial.

3. January 3, 1947, the motion for a new trial was denied.

4. January 10, 1947, a motion to vacate the order of January 3,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hurley v. Lake CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  2. Palomar Refining Co. v. PrenticeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Berge v. International Harvester Co.California Court of Appeal · 1983
  2. Hardin v. ElvitskyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  3. Bird v. McGuireCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Kisling v. OtaniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. Richards v. FlowerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API