Legal Opinion

State v. Alaska State Employees Ass'n

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided August 22, 2008No. S-12686PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MATTHEWS, Justice.

The question presented is whether the State is protected by sovereign immunity from payment of prejudgment interest on an award made by an arbitrator under a collective bargaining agreement. The superior court decided that the State was not so protected and awarded prejudgment interest on the arbitrator's award. We largely affirm because the enforcement of the arbitrator's award in this case sounds in contract and is enforceable in a proceeding encompassed by the general statute applicable to contract claims against the State, which waives immunity as to prejudgment…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Gates v. City of Tenakee SpringsAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Kentucky River Mills v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1953
  3. Stewart & Grindle, Inc. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Runyon v. Ass'n of Village Council PresidentsAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Glover v. State, Department of Transportation, Marine Highway SystemAlaska Supreme Court · 2008

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. ALASKA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES ASS'NAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
  2. McCrary v. Ivanof Bay VillageAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
  3. DOT Lake Village v. Dená Nená HenashAlaska Supreme Court · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API