Stone v. Employment Division

Petitioner seeks review of a decision of the Employment Appeals Board holding that he had voluntarily left his employment without good cause, and disqualifying him from the receipt of unemployment compensation benefits.1 On appeal petitioner contends that the Board made a finding of fact and arrived at a conclusion, both of which were unsupported by substantial evidence in the record before it, and that its ultimate holding was therefore erroneous as a matter of law, i.e., "unlawful in substance.”2

The Board entered the following "findings of fact and conclusions”:

"(1) [Petitioner] worked for…