Legal Opinion
Kasen v. Morrell
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 15, 1957PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChables J. Beckinella, J.
Each of the three motions herein seeks a dismissal of specific causes of action contained in the complaint, for legal insufficiency pursuant to subdivision 4 of rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice, or in the alternative, - corrective relief is sought under rules 90, 92,102 and 103 of the Rules of Civil Practice and sections 241 and 258 of the Civil Practice Act.
On September 29, 1955 plaintiff and defendant Charlotte S. Morrell entered into a contract, Exhibit “ A ” annexed to the complaint, by the terms of which plaintiff agreed to purchase and Charlotte S. Morrell agreed to sell a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Martin v. PeytonNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Hardin v. RobinsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
- Isaacs v. Washougal Clothing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
- Hannevig & Johnsen, Inc. v. LougheedAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
- Cohen v. Pyramid Bond & Mortgage Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Beatie v. DeLongAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Kasen v. MorrellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958
- Carlson v. Frank Samuel & Co.New York Supreme Court · 1961