Legal Opinion

United States of America, Ex Rel., Don H. Haycock v. Hughes Aircraft Company

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 21, 1996No. 94-55620, 94-55826PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KLEINFELD, Circuit Judge:

Must an appeal in a qui tam case, in which the government has declined intervention, be filed within thirty days or sixty?

Mr. Haycock as relator brought a qui tam action in the name of the United States. See 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-3733; 10 U.S.C. § 2306. The United States filed a notice of its decision not to intervene in the action. The government may “notify the court that it declines to take over the action, in which case the person bringing the action shall have the right to conduct the action.” 31 U.S.C. § 3730(b)(4)(B). In that circumstance, the government may…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States of America, Ex Rel. Kevin G. Kelly v. The Boeing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  2. United States ex rel. Petrofsky v. Van Cott, Bagley, Cornwall, McCarthyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
  3. United States ex rel. Custom Fabricators, Inc. v. Dick Olson Constructors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. United States ex rel. Eisenstein v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. United States ex rel. Russell v. Epic Healthcare Management GroupCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
  3. United States Ex Rel. Friedrich Lu v. David W. OuCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
  4. Rodriguez v. Our Lady of Lourdes Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
  5. United States Ex Rel. Eisenstein v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API