Legal Opinion

Heacock v. Town

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1966No. 661PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DIMOND, Justice.

Appellant has appealed from a judgment based on a jury verdict which awarded appellant $500 as damages for an injury resulting from a rear-impact collision involving-appellant’s car and a car driven by appel-lee.

During the impaneling of the jury, a Mr'. Bob Thomas was called as a prospective juror, and the following examination by Mr. Parrish, appellant’s trial counsel, 1 took place:

MR. PARRISH: Bob * * * I’m sure you know both Mr, McNealy and • I by our first names?

MR. THOMAS: I do. . . :

MR. PARRISH: And * * *■ you have sat on civil juries before?

MR. THOMAS: And I sat…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Benz v. Compania Naviera Hidalgo, S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Virginian Ry. Co. v. ArmentroutCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1948
  3. Trowbridge v. Abrasive Co. Of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
  4. Bucher v. KrauseCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1953
  5. Smith v. WelchCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Murray v. FeightAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Hoppe v. McDonaldIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Jakoski v. HollandAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Kenai Chrysler Center, Inc. v. DenisonAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  5. City of Fairbanks v. SmithAlaska Supreme Court · 1974

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API