Legal Opinion

Munns v. Martin

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1997No. 63837-3PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTalmadge, J.

We are confronted yet again with the question of whether a local land use ordinance designed to further historic preservation and aesthetic purposes violates our State’s free exercise of religion clause, Wash. Const, art. I, § 11 (amend. 34) when applied to a structure that is part of a church’s religious ministry.

Walla Walla’s demolition permit ordinance provides a "cooling off period” during which the religious organization is subject to negotiation with governmental and private authorities before an historic or architecturally significant structure can be demolished. The ordinance is an…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Sherbert v. VernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Abington School Dist. v. SchemppSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. State v. HendricksonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. HendricksonWashington Supreme Court · 1996

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Locke v. DaveySupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Robinson v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  3. Robinson v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  4. Open Door Baptist Church v. Clark CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Open Door Baptist Church v. Clark CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2000

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API