Legal Opinion
Brooklyn Union Gas Co. v. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp.
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided June 29, 1960No. Civ. A. Nos. 12474, 12482PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
INGRAHAM, District Judge.
These consolidated proceedings consist of actions in which- plaintiffs, who are distributors of natural gas in eastern seaboard areas, seek restitution of monies paid by defendant Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation (Transco) to defendants Socony Mobil Oil Company, Inc. (Mobil) and The Ohio Oil Company (Ohio) through increases in price for natural gas sold and delivered to Transco. The case is submitted upon. the pleadings, affidavits, and motions for summary judgment of all parties concerned.
Transco operates under certificate from the Federal Power Commission…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Scripps-Howard Radio, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Arkadelphia Milling Co. v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Arkadelphia Co. v. St. Louis SW Ry. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Culver v. PickensTexas Supreme Court · 1948
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- City of Gainesville v. Florida Power & Light Co.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1980
- Brooklyn Union Gas Co. v. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1960
- Socony Mobil Oil Co. v. Brooklyn Union Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
- Socony Mobil Oil Company, Inc. v. Brooklyn Union Gas Company, the Ohio Oil Company v. Brooklyn Union Gas Company, Brooklyn Union Gas Company v. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation, Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation v. The Ohio Oil Company and Socony Mobil Oil Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
- United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Socony Mobil Oil Co.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1963