Legal Opinion
Brooklyn Union Gas Co. v. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp.
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided November 23, 1960No. Civ. A. 12474, 12482PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
INGRAHAM, District Judge.
In opinion filed June 29, 1960, 201 F.Supp. 673, plaintiffs, distributors of natural gas, were given restitution of monies paid by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation (Transco) to its codefendants, Socony Mobil Oil Company, Inc. (Mobil) and The Ohio Oil Company (Ohio), through increases in price for natural gas sold and delivered to Transco. Defendant and cross-plaintiff Transco’s fourth motion for summary judgment and alternative motion for severance is before the court. This motion deals with Transco’s right to recover from Mobil and Ohio, for the use and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Robert C. Herd & Co. v. Krawill MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Cherokee Nation v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America, and v. D. D. Harrington, and D. D. Harrington, and v. Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America, AndCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
- T. & M. Transp. Co. v. S. W. Shattuck Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1947
- Miner v. Paris Exchange BankTexas Supreme Court · 1880
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Stahl Petroleum Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1978
- Lightcap v. Mobil Oil CorporationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1977
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- City of Gainesville v. Florida Power & Light Co.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1980
- Middlewest Motor Freight Bureau v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.