Connor v. Uvalde Nat. Bank
Court of Appeals of Texas
Appeal from Uvalde County Court; T. M. Milam, Judge. Action by the Uvalde National Bank against F. E. Seawell and others. From a judgment for plaintiff against all defendants, and in favor of defendant M. Connor against defendant J. PI. Patterson on the latter’s plea of contribution, defendant M. Connor appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtMoursund, J.
The Uvalde National Bank sued F. E. Seawell, M. Connor, and J. H. Patterson upon a promissory note for ?815, alleging that the note was a joint and several obligation, and that Connor’s name was signed thereto by Seawell, who was duly authorized to sign said Connor’s name thereto. Connor filed a plea of non est factum, a general demurrer, and general denial. Patterson admitted the execution of the note, and prayed for judgment over against Sea-well for any amount he might have to pay, and also for contribution over against Con-nor. Connor also filed a plea for judgment against Patterson for…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Collins v. Panhandle National BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1889
- Connor v. Uvalde Nat. BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
- Price v. LauveTexas Supreme Court · 1878
3Cited by10 opinions
- Strong v. HarwellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
- First State Bank of Amarillo v. CooperCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
- Heard v. BowenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
- Morales v. ClineCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
- Bundick v. Moore-Cortes Canal Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1915
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.