Legal Opinion

Bundick v. Moore-Cortes Canal Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 19, 1915No. 5479. [fn†]PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On July 5, 1911, the Moore-Cortes Canal Company filed its original petition in trespass to try title, seeking to recover two certain tracts of land from O. C. Bundick, Peter B. Bundick, Mrs. Clementine Bundick (a widow), Mrs. Matilda Ryman and her husband, Philip Ryman, C. T. Freeman, J. H. Freeman, E. T. Freeman, Jeff Bundick, and H. M. Bundick, individually and also in his capacities as guardian of Jeff Bundick and administrator of the estate of Theo W. Bundick, and suing as warrantors W. C. Moore, A. P. Borden, and Mrs. Mamie P. Withers, executors of the estate of A. H. Pierce, and Mrs.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bracken v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Holland v. NanceTexas Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Wallis, Landes & Co. v. StuartTexas Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Titel v. GarlandTexas Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Schunior v. RussellTexas Supreme Court · 1892

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Buie v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  2. Thompson v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  3. Wells v. LairdCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  4. Lopez v. VelaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  5. Porter v. TolbertCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API